Episode 36: Code XL - Loading the end wall - What should be considered?

Episode 36: Code XL - Loading the end wall - What should be considered?

The increased use of Code XL superstructures is a good thing in itself. In practice, however, mistakes are made time and again because those involved are often unaware of the boundary conditions that need to be observed to ensure that the strength of the superstructure can be utilized while preventing overloading.

In today's edition of the LaSi blog, I would like to take a closer look at the bulkhead and describe a few common faults and their remedies.

Two construction methods have been developed for the end walls. One consists of a full-surface steel end wall and the other of transverse aluminum panels. Both are connected to the corner posts.

The bulkhead is the component of a vehicle that has to absorb the most force in the event of an emergency stop with a deceleration of 0.8g.

If you take the time to read EN-12142 carefully, you will see that it is a test standard for vehicle bodies. Initially, it has nothing to do with load securing.

Only at the very end does the 2016 edition state that the proven forces can also be used for load securing.

This statement puts what most people have already done on a legally secure footing.

The test standard states that the end wall must be tested across its entire width.

The minimum strength specifications (50% of the technical working load [P]) must be achieved in ¾ of the end wall height.

This is precisely where mistakes are often made, because the load does not cover the entire width of the end wall or does not have a positive fit to the end wall.

So what are the causes?

Some body manufacturers design the front wall so that it forms a flat U-profile.

The picture shows that the first row of pallets partially disappears behind it.

When loading from the side, the loader must ensure that he pushes the pallets behind the profile so that the gap is closed.

If the forklift truck has a side lift, this is an advantage for the loading process because it makes it easier to stow the load tightly against the front wall.

The result could look like this picture.

During braking, the load deformed the bulkhead together with the holder for the connections.

Recognizable by the gap between the bracket, which is permanently deformed, and the front wall.

Another source of error is the problem of load distribution. The overall center of gravity of the load must be shifted to the rear, for example, so as not to overload the drive axle.

In the following example, the empty palettes can only be seen symbolically as placeholders. They must of course be packed in real time.

The solution to the problem is often to place the pallets one behind the other.

As a result, the force exerted by the load during emergency braking is transferred to too small an area.

The end wall is massively overloaded and can be damaged.

A better solution would be to place two pallets across the front wall so that the entire width is used.

Then continue to stow the pallets individually in a form-fit manner.

How many have to be stowed individually depends on the respective load or pallet weight.

Another solution is the use of bumper pads as gap fillers or spacers. However, this is more of an approach for regularly recurring situations.

But then it is an elegant, fast and efficient solution. It looks like this:

The first row of loaders is positioned directly and positively against the front wall in order to transmit the power across the entire width.

An appropriately dimensioned 3D stowage cushion is then inserted and the next row of loads is stowed flush and flush against it.

After the second row of loading, another stowage cushion can be positioned and then the rest of the load.

How the overall center of gravity changes must be checked on the basis of the load distribution plan.

In any case, it is important that the force is transmitted evenly across the width of the end wall.

The following two pictures show an impression of incorrect end wall loading:

An A-frame was used as a spacer.

When braking, the load transferred the force to the bulkhead via the too small surface of the A-frame.

It was overloaded and gave way. The aluminum blanks were simply pressed through.

The load was stowed in such a way that it did not cover the entire width of the bulkhead.

The steel end wall was pushed out during braking. The connection between the end wall and the corner posts yielded to this force.
Source: March 2016 - Transport Informations Service (tis-gdv.de)

Interested readers can find more pictures and details of this situation here.

It is therefore important that those responsible in a company where such situations could arise deal with the matter.

Typical loads that can cause such damage are, for example: Mesh boxes, octabins, big bags, IBCs or full pallets with beverage crates.

Your Sigurd Ehringer.